mdh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing behavioural medicine in physiotherapy treatment: Part I: Clinical trial
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1912-3110
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för hälsa, vård och välfärd. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5064-8820
2010 (Engelska)Ingår i: Advances in Physiotherapy, ISSN 1403-8196, E-ISSN 1651-1948, Vol. 12, nr 1, s. 2-12Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To investigate the capacity of the Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) to discriminate between subgroups for targeting of treatment, investigate effects of treatment tailored to patients' individual and functional goals, and identify a suitable treatment dosage for patients with low risk of disability. Explorative study, Part I. Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial with four treatment conditions. Methods: Patients in primary healthcare (n=45) with musculoskeletal pain for ≥4 weeks were included. PBSI-identified subgroups were validated by comparing scores on four established instruments. Measures of disability and patients' ratings of global outcome were used to examine treatment effect. Results: PBSI data adequately defined patients with either high or low risk of disability. Patients in the tailored treatment rated global outcome as better than in the non-tailored treatment. No differences were found on disability measures. For the low-risk group, the brief tailored treatment was as effective as the non-targeted control treatment. Conclusion: The PBSI adequately defined subgroups. Tailored treatment was partially superior to physical exercise treatment. Targeting by treatment dosage was effective for low-risk patients but remains to be investigated for high-risk patients. Treatment integrity for tailored treatments was compromised and is to be further explored in the following study.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2010. Vol. 12, nr 1, s. 2-12
Nyckelord [en]
Pain, PBSI, primary healthcare, screening, tailored treatment
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-11157DOI: 10.3109/14038190903480664Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77749315523OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-11157DiVA, id: diva2:372235
Tillgänglig från: 2010-11-24 Skapad: 2010-11-24 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-12Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Sandborgh, MariaDenison, Eva

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Sandborgh, MariaDenison, Eva
Av organisationen
Akademin för hälsa, vård och välfärd
I samma tidskrift
Advances in Physiotherapy
Medicin och hälsovetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 46 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf