mdh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing behavioural medicine in physiotherapy treatment: Part I: Clinical trial
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-1912-3110
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för hälsa, vård och välfärd. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5064-8820
2010 (engelsk)Inngår i: Advances in Physiotherapy, ISSN 1403-8196, E-ISSN 1651-1948, Vol. 12, nr 1, s. 2-12Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To investigate the capacity of the Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI) to discriminate between subgroups for targeting of treatment, investigate effects of treatment tailored to patients' individual and functional goals, and identify a suitable treatment dosage for patients with low risk of disability. Explorative study, Part I. Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial with four treatment conditions. Methods: Patients in primary healthcare (n=45) with musculoskeletal pain for ≥4 weeks were included. PBSI-identified subgroups were validated by comparing scores on four established instruments. Measures of disability and patients' ratings of global outcome were used to examine treatment effect. Results: PBSI data adequately defined patients with either high or low risk of disability. Patients in the tailored treatment rated global outcome as better than in the non-tailored treatment. No differences were found on disability measures. For the low-risk group, the brief tailored treatment was as effective as the non-targeted control treatment. Conclusion: The PBSI adequately defined subgroups. Tailored treatment was partially superior to physical exercise treatment. Targeting by treatment dosage was effective for low-risk patients but remains to be investigated for high-risk patients. Treatment integrity for tailored treatments was compromised and is to be further explored in the following study.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2010. Vol. 12, nr 1, s. 2-12
Emneord [en]
Pain, PBSI, primary healthcare, screening, tailored treatment
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-11157DOI: 10.3109/14038190903480664Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77749315523OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-11157DiVA, id: diva2:372235
Tilgjengelig fra: 2010-11-24 Laget: 2010-11-24 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-12bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Sandborgh, MariaDenison, Eva

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Sandborgh, MariaDenison, Eva
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Advances in Physiotherapy

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 46 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf