https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Economic feasibility of using fuel cells as backup power supply in data centers
The National Research Base of Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China.
Key Laboratory of Refrigeration Technology of Tianjin, International Centre in Fundamental and Engineering Thermophysics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.
Centre for Strategic Energy and Resources, Singapore, Singapore.
Key Laboratory of Refrigeration Technology of Tianjin, International Centre in Fundamental and Engineering Thermophysics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, ISSN 2213-1388, E-ISSN 2213-1396, Vol. 69, article id 103892Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The backup power system (BPS) is essential to data centers (DCs) in case of grid outage. Currently, the diesel generator (DG) is the most commonly used solution. However, due to the need of decarbonization, fuel cells (FCs) are emerging as a promising alternative. This paper conducts a holistic economic analysis to investigate the benefit from using FCs to replace DGs, which takes into account more key impact factors. Different requirements by different Tiers of DCs, such as on the BPS runtime and the BPS test time, are considered. Under the benchmark condition, i.e. 800 USD/kW for the FC capital cost, 4.8 USD/kg, 1.25 USD/L and 90 USD/ton for hydrogen, diesel, and CO2 prices, the payback period is 13.4 years and 13.1 years when using FCs to replace DGs for Tier 1–2 DCs and Tier 3 DCs. Since Tier 4 DCs require more units, FCs can be economically feasible if the FC capital cost reduces by 20.3 %, the diesel price increases by 19.7 %, or the green hydrogen price decreases by 35.5 %, compared to the benchmark conditions. Among the factors, the FC capital cost, the diesel price, and the hydrogen price are found to affect the payback period mostly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2024. Vol. 69, article id 103892
Keywords [en]
Backup power supply, Data centers, Diesel generators, Economic analysis, Proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Costs, Diesel engines, Hydrogen, Investments, Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC), Standby power systems, Back-up power, Backup power supplies, Capitals costs, Condition, Datacenter, Diesel prices, Economics analysis, Payback periods, Proton-exchange membranes fuel cells
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-68112DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2024.103892Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85198608264OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-68112DiVA, id: diva2:1885576
Available from: 2024-07-24 Created: 2024-07-24 Last updated: 2024-07-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, Hailong

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, Hailong
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf