https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dynamic modeling of MEA-based CO2 capture in biomass-fired CHP plants
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3907-1987
2024 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Global warming is a significant threat to our planet. Adopting the Paris Agreement is a global action that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. An extensive deployment of negative emission technologies (NETs) is required to achieve the targets set by the Paris Agreement. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is emerging as one of the most promising NETs. Among different biomass utilization processes, integrating BECCS with biomass-fired and waste-fired combined heat and power (bio-CHP and w-CHP) plants has been considered the most feasible solution. Bio/w-CHP plants are characterized by high fluctuations in operation, which can result in more dynamic variations of flue gas (FG) flowrates and compositions and available heat for CO2 capture. Such changes can clearly affect the performance of CO2 capture; therefore, doing dynamic simulations becomes crucial.

This thesis aims to investigate the performance of different dynamic physical model-based approaches and provide suggestions for approach selection. In addition, the data-driven modeling approach, which is an emerging technology, has also been tested.

Three physical model-based approaches include the ideal static model (IST), the dynamic approach without control (Dw/oC), and the dynamic approach with control (DwC). To compare their performance, the operating data from an actual waste CHP plant is employed. Various cases have been defined considering different critical operating parameters, including the FG flowrate, the CO2 concentration (CO2vol%), and the available heat for CO2 capture. Apparent differences can be observed in the results from different approaches. For example, when the CO2vol% drops from 15.7 % to 9.7 % (about 38 %) within 4 hours, the difference in the captured CO2 can be up to 22% between DwC and Dw/oC. It is worth noting that when there are both increases and decreases in the variations of parameters, the differences become smaller. 

Based on the comparison, the recommendations on approaches have been summarized. Dw/oC is recommended for checking the boundary of safety operation by the response analysis. DwC is recommended for designing the control system, observing the flexible dynamic operation, estimating the short-term CO2 capture potential, and optimizing the hourly dynamic operation. IST is recommended for estimating the long-term CO2 capture potential, and optimizing the long-term dynamic operation when the input parameters vary not as often as hourly.

A data-driven model, Informer, is developed to model CO2 capture dynamically. The dataset is generated by using a physical model. The FG flowrate, the CO2vol%, the lean solvent flowrate, and the available heat for CO2 capture are employed as input parameters, and the CO2 capture rate and the energy penalty are chosen as outputs. The results show that Informer can accurately predict dynamic CO2 capture. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was found to be 6.2% and 2.7% for predicting the CO2 capture rate and energy penalty, respectively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Mälardalens universitet, 2024.
Series
Mälardalen University Press Licentiate Theses, ISSN 1651-9256 ; 356
National Category
Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-66188ISBN: 978-91-7485-637-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-66188DiVA, id: diva2:1843276
Presentation
2024-04-22, Milos, Mälardalens University, Västerås, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 51592–1Available from: 2024-03-08 Created: 2024-03-08 Last updated: 2024-04-01Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Selecting the approach for dynamic modelling of CO2 capture in biomass/waste fired CHP plants
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Selecting the approach for dynamic modelling of CO2 capture in biomass/waste fired CHP plants
Show others...
2023 (English)In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, ISSN 1750-5836, E-ISSN 1878-0148, Vol. 130, article id 104008Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Integrating CO2 capture with biomass/waste fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants is a promising method to achieve negative emissions. However, the use of versatile biomass/waste and the dynamic operation of CHP plants result in bigger fluctuations in the properties of flue gas (FG), e.g. CO2 concentration (CO2vol%) and flowrates, and the heat that can be used for CO2 capture, when comparing with coal fired power plants. To address such a challenge, dynamic modelling is essential to accurately estimate the amount of captured CO2 and optimize the operation of CO2 capture. This paper compares three dynamic approaches commonly used in literature, namely using the ideal static model (IST) and using dynamic models without control (Dw/oC) and with control (DwC), for MEA based chemical absorption CO2 capture. The performance of approaches is assessed under the variations of key factors, including the flowrate and CO2vol% of FG, and the available heat for CO2 capture. Simulation results show clear differences. For example, when the CO2vol% drops from 15.7 % to 9.7 % (about 38 %) within 4 hours, DwC gives the highest amount of captured CO2, which is 7.3 % and 22.3 % higher than IST and Dw/oC, respectively. It is also found that the time step size has a clear impact on the CO2 capture amount, especially for DwC. Based on the results, suggestions are also provided regarding the selection of dynamic modelling approaches for different purposes of simulations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd, 2023
Keywords
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), Biomass/waste fired combined heat and power plants, Dynamic modelling approach, Dynamic performance, MEA based chemical absorption, Biomass, Carbon capture, Coal fired power plant, Cogeneration plants, Ethanolamines, Fossil fuel power plants, Gas plants, More electric aircraft, Bioenergies with carbon capture and storages, Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, Biomass wastes, Biomass/waste fired combined heat and power plant, Chemical absorption, Dynamic modeling approach, Dynamics models, Static modelling, Carbon dioxide
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-64753 (URN)10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.104008 (DOI)001112149200001 ()2-s2.0-85175621556 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2023-11-15 Created: 2023-11-15 Last updated: 2024-03-08Bibliographically approved
2. AI-based Dynamic Modelling for CO2 Capture
Open this publication in new window or tab >>AI-based Dynamic Modelling for CO2 Capture
2023 (English)In: Energy Proceedings, 2023, Vol. 37Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Integrating CO2 capture with biomass/waste fired combined heat and power plants (CHPs) is a promising method to achieve negative emission. However, the use of versatile biomass/waste and dynamic operation of CHPs result in big fluctuations in the flue gas (FG) and heat input to CO2 capture. Dynamic modelling is essential to investigate the interactions between key process parameters in producing the dynamic response of the CO2 capture process. In order to facilitate developing robust control strategies for flexible operation in CO2 capture plants and optimizing the operation of CO2 capture plants, artificial intelligence (AI) models are superior to mechanical models due to the easy implementation into the control and optimization. This paper aims to develop an AI model, Informer, to predict the dynamic responses of MEA based CO2 capture performance from waste-fired CHP plants. Dynamic modelling was first developed in Aspen HYSYS software and validated against the reference. The operation data from the simulated CO2 capture process was then used to develop and verify Informer. The following variables were employed as inputs: inlet flue gas flow rate, CO2 concentration in inlet flue gas, lean solvent flow rate, heat input to CO2 capture. It was found that Informer could predict CO2 capture rate and energy consumption with the mean absolute percentage error of 6.2% and 2.7% respectively.

Series
Energy Proceedings, ISSN 2004-2965
Keywords
artificial intelligence (AI), dynamic modelling, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), combined heat and power (CHP) plants, energy consumption
National Category
Environmental Engineering Energy Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-66187 (URN)10.46855/energy-proceedings-10770 (DOI)2-s2.0-85190650594 (Scopus ID)
Conference
The International Conference on Energy, Ecology and Environment
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, 51592-1
Available from: 2024-03-08 Created: 2024-03-08 Last updated: 2024-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3229 kB)171 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 3229 kBChecksum SHA-512
34e35a658234cabb9a0f2ea2d8c57c4552e986370766a030c85785514159008dbd5f8a01015d9b6b268205e1b100e5acb389d7bfb81dc5805bfe1fff59a7bc7a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Dong, Beibei

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dong, Beibei
By organisation
Future Energy Center
Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 171 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 443 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf