Paradoxes of person‐centred care: A discussion paperShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Nursing Open, E-ISSN 2054-1058, Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
AIM: Previous research has mainly focused on the advantages of PCC and less on its disadvantages. Hence, there is a need to further explore the recent research regard-ing PCC from both sides. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to elucidate the advan-tages and disadvantages of PCC.
DESIGN: Discussion paper.
METHODS: We searched relevant literature published January 2000–March 2018 in PubMed, Medline, CHINAL, Scopus and Web of Science.
RESULTS: The results showed that PCC can contribute to improved health and well-being, improved mutual interaction in relationships, improved cost-effectiveness and im-proved work environment, while the disadvantages can involve increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of certain groups, increased personal and financial costs, exclu-sion of staff's personhood and unfairness due to empathy. An analysis of the existing literature on PCC showed paradoxes, which call for further investigation.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329
Keywords [en]
clinical practice, concept, evidence, healthcare, person-centred care
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-48639DOI: 10.1002/nop2.520ISI: 000539141600001PubMedID: 32802352Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086160592OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-48639DiVA, id: diva2:1439057
2020-06-112020-06-112020-11-20Bibliographically approved