mdh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Democracy and sustainable development--what is the alternative to cost-benefit analysis?
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för ekonomi, samhälle och teknik, Industriell ekonomi och organisation.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-2689-819X
2006 (Engelska)Ingår i: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, ISSN 1551-3777, E-ISSN 1551-3793, Vol. 2, nr 2, s. 182-190Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is part of neoclassical economics, a specific paradigm, or theoretical perspective. In searching for alternatives to CBA, competing theoretical frameworks in economics appear to be a natural starting point. Positional analysis (PA) as an alternative to CBA is built on institutional theory and a different set of assumptions about human beings, organizations, markets, etc. Sustainable development (SD) is a multidimensional concept that includes social and ecological dimensions in addition to monetary aspects. If the political commitment to SD in the European Union and elsewhere is taken seriously, then approaches to decision making should be chosen that 1st open the door for multidimensional analysis rather than close it. Sustainable development suggests a direction for development in a broad sense but is still open to different interpretations. Each such interpretation is political in kind, and a 2nd criterion for judging different approaches is whether they are ideologically open rather than closed. Although methods for decision making have traditionally been connected with mathematical objective functions and optimization, the purpose of PA is to illuminate a decision situation in a many-sided way with respect to possibly relevant ideological orientations, alternatives, and consequences. Decisions are understood in terms of matching the ideological orientation of each decision maker with the expected effects profile of each alternative considered. Appropriateness and pattern recognition are other concepts in understanding this process.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2006. Vol. 2, nr 2, s. 182-190
Nyckelord [en]
article, cost benefit analysis, economics, environmental protection, legal aspect, political system, Conservation of Natural Resources, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Democracy
Nationell ämneskategori
Ekonomi och näringsliv
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-31903DOI: 10.1897/1551-3793(2006)2[182:DASDIT]2.0.CO;2Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-37049017325OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-31903DiVA, id: diva2:937838
Anmärkning

Correspondence Address: Söderbaum, P.email: peter.soderbaum@mdh.se

Tillgänglig från: 2016-06-16 Skapad: 2016-06-14 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-11-28Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Söderbaum, Peter

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Söderbaum, Peter
Av organisationen
Industriell ekonomi och organisation
I samma tidskrift
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Ekonomi och näringsliv

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 18 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf