mdh.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors affecting the implementation process of clinical pathways: A mixed method study within the context of Swedish intensive care
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för hälsa, vård och välfärd, Hälsa och välfärd. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0667-7111
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 255-261Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale, aims and objectives Clinical pathways (CPs) can improve quality of care on intensive care units (ICUs), but are infrequently utilized and of varying quality. Knowledge regarding factors that facilitate versus hinder successful implementation of CPs is insufficient and a better understanding of the activities and individuals involved is needed. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation process of CPs within the context of ICUs. Methods An exploratory design with a sequential mixed method was used. A CP survey, including all Swedish ICUs, was used to collect quantitative data from ICUs using CPs (n = 15) and interviews with key informants (n = 10) were used to collect qualitative data from the same ICUs. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used, and the quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated. Results The CP implementation was conceptualized according to two interplaying themes: a process to realize the usefulness of CPs and create new habits; and a necessity of enthusiasm, support and time. Multiple factors affected the process and those factors were organized in six main categories and 14 subcategories. Conclusions Bottom-up initiatives, interprofessional project groups and small ICUs seem to enhance successful implementation of CPs while inadequate electronic health record systems, insufficient support and time constrains can be barriers. Support regarding the whole implementation process from centralized units at the local hospitals, as well as cooperation between ICUs and national guidance, has the potential to raise the quality of CPs and benefit the progress of CP implementation.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2015. Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 255-261
Nyckelord [en]
clinical pathways, evidence-based practice, implementation, intensive care, organization, standardized care plans
Nationell ämneskategori
Hälsovetenskaper
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-27815DOI: 10.1111/jep.12301ISI: 000351871200013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925586222OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-27815DiVA, id: diva2:801484
Tillgänglig från: 2015-04-09 Skapad: 2015-04-09 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-06-26Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Nordgren, Lena

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Nordgren, Lena
Av organisationen
Hälsa och välfärd
I samma tidskrift
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice
Hälsovetenskaper

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 50 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf