mdh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Incorporating the practice of arguing in Stein et al.'s model for helping teachers plan and conduct productive whole-class discussions
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för utbildning, kultur och kommunikation, Utbildningsvetenskap och Matematik. (M-TERM)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-6518-1418
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Development of Mathematics Teaching: Design, Scale, Effects: Proceedings from MADIF9: The Ninth Swedish Mathematics Education Research Seminar, Umeå, February, 4-5, 2014 / [ed] O. Helenius, A. Engström, T. Meaney, P. Nilsson, E. Norén, J. Sayers, & M. Österholm, Linköping: SMDF , 2015, s. 97-106Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

How can pedagogical models support in-service and pre-service teachers in the complexity of orchestrating productive mathematical whole-class discussions? The overarching aim of this paper is to elaborate on a newly developed model to make it an even more useful tool for teachers to manage the challenging task of conducting productive whole-class discussions. Analyses of audio-recorded interviews and video-recorded whole-class discussions with a proficient mathematics teacher result in principles for how student solutions can be sequenced in order to take into account argumentation as well as connection-making in whole-class discussions. The findings suggest broadening the last practice in the five practices model to also incorporate the practice of arguing.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Linköping: SMDF , 2015. s. 97-106
Emneord [en]
problem solving, whole-class discussion, argumentation, connection-making, five practices model
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
didaktik
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-29401OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-29401DiVA, id: diva2:865158
Konferanse
MADIF9
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-10-27 Laget: 2015-10-27 Sist oppdatert: 2015-10-28bibliografisk kontrollert
Inngår i avhandling
1. Orchestrating mathematical whole-class discussions in the problem-solving classroom: Theorizing challenges and support for teachers
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Orchestrating mathematical whole-class discussions in the problem-solving classroom: Theorizing challenges and support for teachers
2015 (engelsk)Doktoravhandling, med artikler (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

Promising teaching approaches for developing students’ mathematical competencies include the approach of teaching mathematics through problem solving. Orchestrating a whole-class discussion of students’ ideas is an important aspect of teaching through problem solving. There is a wide consensus within the field that it is very challenging for the teacher to conduct class discussions that both build on student ideas and highlight key mathematical ideas and relationships. Further, fostering argumentation in the class, which is important for students’ participation, is also a grand challenge. Teachers need support in these challenges. The aim of the thesis is to characterize challenges and support for mathematics teachers in orchestrating productive problem-solving whole-class discussions that focus on both mathematical connection-making and argumentation. In particular, it is investigated how Stein et al.’s (2008) model with five practices – anticipating, monitoring, selecting, sequencing and connecting student solutions – can support teachers to handle the challenges and what constitutes the limitations of the research-based and widely-used model. This thesis builds on six papers. The papers are based on three intervention studies and on one study of a mathematics teacher proficient in conducting problem-solving class discussions. Video recordings of observed whole-class discussions as well as audio-recorded teacher interviews and teacher meetings constitute the data that are analyzed. It is concluded in the thesis that the five practices model supports teachers’ preparation before the lesson by the practice of anticipating. However, making detailed anticipations, which is shown to be both challenging and important to foster argumentation in the class, is not explicitly supported by the model. Further, the practice of monitoring supports teachers in using the variety of student solutions to highlight key mathematical ideas and connections. Challenging aspects not supported by the monitoring practice are, however, how to interact with students during their exploration to actually get a variety of different solutions as a basis for argumentation. The challenge of selecting and sequencing student solutions is supported for the purpose of connection-making, but not for the purpose of argumentation. Making mathematical connections can be facilitated by the last practice of connecting, with the help of the previous practices. However, support for distinguishing between different kinds of connections is lacking, as well as support for creating an argumentative classroom culture. Since it is a great challenge to promote argumentation among students, support is needed for this throughout the model. Lastly, despite the importance and challenge of launching a problem productively, it is not supported by the model. Based on the conclusions on challenges and support, developments to the five practices model are suggested. The thesis contributes to research on the theoretical development of tools that support teachers in the challenges of orchestrating productive problem-solving whole-class discussions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Västerås: Mälardalen University, 2015
Serie
Mälardalen University Press Dissertations, ISSN 1651-4238 ; 193
Emneord
whole-class discussion, problem solving, five practices model, mathematical connection, argumentation, inquiry/argument, supportive tool
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
didaktik
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-29409 (URN)978-91-7485-242-4 (ISBN)
Disputas
2015-12-11, Kappa, Mälardalens högskola, Västerås, 13:00 (engelsk)
Opponent
Veileder
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-10-28 Laget: 2015-10-28 Sist oppdatert: 2015-11-24bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Personposter BETA

Larsson, Maria

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Larsson, Maria
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 80 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf