mdh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scientific Excellence in Participatory and Action Research: Part II. Rethinking Objectivity and Reliability
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, Innovation och produktrealisering.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1902-5155
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Technology Innovation Management Review, ISSN 1927-0321, E-ISSN 1927-0321, Vol. 9, nr 5, s. 22-33Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to deal with the following question: Can the concepts of reliability and objectivity be reconceptualized and reappropriated to enable understanding of scientific excellence in participatory and action research? The article shows that it is fruitful to consider the "subjective" and active role of researchers as vital in enabling scientific objectivity and reliability. As an expansion from a replication logic, reliability can be conceptualized as adaptive, goal-seeking, dynamically regulated processes enabled by effective organization of interactive and participatory learning processes where all participants can contribute to learning and correction in inquiry. Instead of erasing subjectivity, objectivity can be enabled by critical subjectivity, intersubjectivity, practical wisdom, impartial norms of inquiry, and open democratic dialogue. Reliability and objectivity in this understanding can be enabled by participatory and action research through skilful performance of research practices such as reflective conversations between parties, dialogue conferences, experimentation, and experiential learning as part of action-research cycles, etc., which are common in participatory and action research initiatives and projects. By rethinking validity, reliability, and objectivity, recognizing the substantially more active and participatory stances enables scientific excellence, it can expand the repertoire of strategies for promoting research quality, and it helps to mainstream this type of approach in the scientific community.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
CARLETON UNIV GRAPHIC SERVICES , 2019. Vol. 9, nr 5, s. 22-33
Emneord [en]
action research, participatory research, objectivity, reliability
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-44526DOI: 10.22215/timreview/1238ISI: 000469475800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-44526DiVA, id: diva2:1330099
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-06-25 Laget: 2019-06-25 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-25bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Lindhult, Erik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Lindhult, Erik
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Technology Innovation Management Review

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 27 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf