https://www.mdu.se/

Objectives

Early parental support, provided by nurses within child health services, aims to strengthen parents in their parenthood. The aim of this integrative review is to describe communication in parental support in encounters between child health nurses and parents in child health services.

Methods

An integrative review was conducted. The databases Cinahl+ , MedLine, Psych Info, and Scopus were searched, 312 articles were screened, and 16 articles were found to be eligible.

Results

The studies included qualitative and quantitative methods, using interviews, focus group interviews, and observations. The findings show an overarching theme: The significance of mutuality in communication in a professional-parental relationship, further described in the following categories, 1) Authoritarian approach: a controlling manner, a neglecting manner, and a teaching manner; 2. Guiding approach: a counselling manner and a compliant manner.

Conclusions

The communication between nurses and parents can be understood as having several layers; the organisational context, the professional skills, knowledge, and experiences, and parents’ knowledge, expectations, and needs. There is a lack of studies of authentic communication between nurses and parents; thus, future research is warranted.

Practice implications:

The authoritarian and guiding approaches in parental support show the required skills a nurse is expected to have, but sufficient organizational prerequisites are also crucial.

BackgroundToday, person-centred care is seen as a cornerstone of health policy and practice, but accommodating individual patient preferences can be challenging, for example involving caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). The aim of this study was to explore Swedish health professionals' perspectives on CSMR and analyse them with regard to potential conflicts that may arise from person-centred care, specifically in relation to shared decision-making.MethodsA qualitative study using both inductive and deductive content analysis was conducted based on semi-structured interviews. It was based on a purposeful sampling of 12 health professionals: seven obstetricians, three midwives and two neonatologists working at different hospitals in southern and central Sweden. The interviews were recorded either in a telephone call or in a video conference call, and audio files were deleted after transcription.ResultsIn the interviews, twelve types of expressions (sub-categories) of five types of conflicts (categories) between shared decision-making and CSMR emerged. Most health professionals agreed in principle that women have the right to decide over their own body, but did not believe this included the right to choose surgery without medical indications (patient autonomy). The health professionals also expressed that they had to consider not only the woman's current preferences and health but also her future health, which could be negatively impacted by a CSMR (treatment quality and patient safety). Furthermore, the health professionals did not consider costs in the individual decision, but thought CSMR might lead to crowding-out effects (avoiding treatments that harm others). Although the health professionals emphasised that every CSMR request was addressed individually, they referred to different strategies for avoiding arbitrariness (equality and non-discrimination). Lastly, they described that CSMR entailed a multifaceted decision being individual yet collective, and the use of birth contracts in order to increase a woman's sense of security (an uncomplicated decision-making process).ConclusionsThe complex landscape for handling CSMR in Sweden, arising from a restrictive approach centred on collective and standardised solutions alongside a simultaneous shift towards person-centred care and individual decision-making, was evident in the health professionals' reasoning. Although most health professionals emphasised that the mode of delivery is ultimately a professional decision, they still strived towards shared decision-making through information and support. Given the different views on CSMR, it is of utmost importance for healthcare professionals and women to reach a consensus on how to address this issue and to discuss what patient autonomy and shared decision-making mean in this specific context. Person-centered care is today a widespread approach, but accommodating individual patient preferences can be challenging, for example involving caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). This study examines Swedish health professionals' views on CSMR. Interviews with 12 health professionals reveal conflicts between CSMR and key aspects of person-centered care, in particular shared decision-making. While professionals acknowledge women's autonomy, they question CSMR without medical need. Concerns include for example treatment quality and patient safety, and avoiding treatments that harm others. The Swedish context, balancing collective solutions with individualized care, complicates decision-making. Unlike countries with more private healthcare, where CSMR support might be higher, Swedish health professionals emphasize shared decision-making despite viewing the mode of delivery as primarily a professional decision. This study sheds light on the challenges in integrating CSMR into person-centered care frameworks.

Purpose

To explore how stroke survivors experience and prefer to participate in clinical reasoning processes in the subacute phase of stroke rehabilitation.

Methods

An explorative qualitative design was used. Individual interviews were conducted with 10 stroke survivors (4 women and 6 men, mean age 68 years) 4 weeks after their stroke, and follow-up interviews were conducted with 6 of them after 10 weeks. The interview settings were the patient’s home during their home rehabilitation, an inpatient and an outpatient rehabilitation unit. A reflexive thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Four themes were identified: discharge as a critical point for participation, describing a stressful time with varying involvement; supportive actions and context as crucial for participation, describing collaboration with the stroke team, the team’s consideration of the stroke survivor’s resources and needs, and a supportive home environment; the importance of goals and follow-up, describing goals as motivational and an unstructured use of goals; and difficulties in participation, describing a lack of dialogue with the stroke team and undetected resources and needs.

Conclusions

The stroke survivors experienced changes in their participation in the clinical reasoning process as their rehabilitation progressed. They moved from perceiving themselves as passengers at the time of their hospital discharge to gradually seeing themselves as the driver of their rehabilitation process. Some person-centered attributes, such as respectful relationships and a health focus, were incorporated into the clinical reasoning, while others, such as a holistic view and shared goal-setting, required further emphasis for improved person-centeredness in stroke rehabilitation.

BackgroundPersons who become life-threateningly ill or injured (due to for example trauma or cardiac arrest) are cared for in hospitals' designated emergency rooms at the emergency department (ED). In these rooms, the life-threatening condition and biomedical focus may reinforce a culture that value the medical-technical care. Meeting patients fundamental care needs (integrating physical, psychosocial and relational care needs) in a person-centred way might hence be challenging in emergency rooms. Little is known about how person-centred fundamental care is experienced and valued by vulnerable and exposed patients in emergency rooms. This study aims to describe fundamental care needs experienced by patients with a life-threating condition in the emergency room.MethodsA descriptive deductive qualitative study with individual interviews were carried out with 15 patients who had been life-threateningly ill or injured and admitted in an emergency room, in Sweden. Data collection was conducted during 2022. Transcribed interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis, based on the Fundamentals of Care framework.ResultsDespite being life-threateningly ill or injured, patients were still able to describe their unique needs-which were not only related to biomedical care. A relationship was established between healthcare professionals and the patient in the initial stage, but not maintained during their stay at the emergency room. Patients felt their physical needs were met to a greater extent than psychosocial and relational needs, despite their prioritizing the latter. Patients preferred personalized care but described care as task oriented. The physical environment limited patients from having their fundamental care needs met, and they adopted to a "patient role" to avoid adding to staff stress. The emergency room situation evoked existential thoughts.ConclusionsThis paper provides unique insights into patients' experiences of being cared for in an emergency room. From the patient perspective, physical care was not enough. Relationship, timely and personalized information, and existential needs were identified as essential fundamental care needs, which were not, or only partly met. The finding highlights the need to embed and prioritize fundamental care in practice also for patients who are life-threateningly ill or injured, which in turn calls for focus on organizational prerequisites to enable person-centred fundamental care.

Introduction: Guidelines are important for guiding clinical practice and governing registered nurses’ work in an emergency room to enable them to secure quality of care and patient safety in a life-saving situation. However, guidelines are not always systematically prepared, or evidence based. This study aimed to map and describe the content of Swedish guidelines governing the registered nurses’ work in emergency rooms. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design, together with a thematic synthesis of content of the submitted guidelines. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and a thematic synthesis. Quality of the guidelines was measured using a modified version of the AGREE II instrument. Results: The result is based on 190 included guidelines, collected from 37 participating emergency departments. The registered nurses’ work in emergency rooms was guided by an instrumental and task-oriented approach to care, with a wide variation in how the registered nurses’ work was described in the guidelines. The quality of the guidelines was poor. The registered nurse was reported as target user in 15 % (n = 29) of the guidelines. None of the guidelines described the population to whom they were meant to apply. In 17 % (n = 32) there was an explicit link between recommendations and supporting evidence. Conclusions: There is a need to improve guidelines to support registered nurses in assessing, treating, and providing fundamental care for patients with life-threatening illnesses in an equal, evidence-based, and person-centered way. Registered nurses should play an active role in the development of the guidelines governing their work. 

AimTo explore the experiences of health visits within the school health services from the perspective of adolescents with migration experiences.DesignA descriptive qualitative study.MethodsData were collected using focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews with adolescents with migration experiences aged 13-17 years old. Analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsThe results described adolescents reading the signs in the guided interaction between them and the school nurses. Reading the signs illustrated the adolescents' continuous interpretation of the interaction with the school nurse, and their decisions on how to respond throughout the health visit. These interpretations influenced the adolescents' shifting willingness to talk about their health and how they adapted to the space of participation provided by the school nurse. The interpretation also influenced their experiences of health visits as focusing on their health without making them feel singled out.ConclusionAlthough individual considerations might be warranted in health visits with adolescents with migration experiences, the results indicate that similarities in intrapersonal communication in various encounters between adolescents and health professionals might be greater than any differences. Healthcare encounters with adolescents with migration experiences might thus need to be conducted with an awareness that adolescents read the signs in the guided interaction and that similarities in this interaction are greater than any differences.

PurposeThe study objective was to investigate how health care providers in stroke teams reason about their clinical reasoning process in collaboration with the patient and next of kin.Materials and methodsAn explorative qualitative design using stimulated recall was employed. Audio-recordings from three rehabilitation dialogs were used as prompts in interviews with the involved staff about their clinical reasoning. A thematic analysis approach was employed.ResultsA main finding was the apparent friction between profession-centered and person-centered clinical reasoning, which was salient in the data. Five themes were identified: the importance of different perspectives for a rich picture and well-informed decisions; shared understanding in analysis and decision-making - good intentions but difficult to achieve; the health care providers' expertise directs the dialog; the context's impact on the rehabilitation dialog; and insights about missed opportunities to grasp the patient perspective and arrive at decisions.ConclusionsInterprofessional stroke teams consider clinical reasoning as a process valuing patient and next of kin perspectives; however, their professional expertise risks preventing individual needs from surfacing. There is a discrepancy between professionals' intentions for person-centeredness and how clinical reasoning plays out. Stimulated recall can unveil person-centered practice and enhance professionals' awareness of their clinical reasoning. The findings provide insights into the clinical reasoning process of interprofessional stroke teams, which can increase awareness and support the development of competencies among health care providers.To increase patient participation in the clinical reasoning process, stroke teams are recommended to clarify the function of goals and the decision-making process in management.Stimulated recall is recommended as a reflective activity in the work of stroke teams to develop awareness and skills in clinical reasoning performed in collaboration between health care providers and patients.

Objective: To explore how stroke survivors experience and prefer to participate in clinical reasoning processes in the acute phase of stroke care. Methods: An explorative qualitative design was used. Individual interviews were conducted with 11 stroke survivors in the acute phase of care and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The analysis identified five themes: What's going on with me?; Being a recipient of care and treatment; The need to be supported to participate; To be seen and strengthened; and Collaboration and joint understanding. Conclusion: Stroke survivors experience many attributes of person-centeredness in the acute phase of care but, according to their stories, their participation in clinical reasoning can be further supported. The tension between surrendering and the desire to be more actively involved in the care needs to be considered to facilitate participation in clinical reasoning. Practice Implications: Stroke survivors’ participation in clinical reasoning in the acute phase can be facilitated by health professionals noticing signs prompting a shift towards increased willingness to participate. Furthermore, health professionals need to take an active role, sharing their expertise and inviting the stroke survivors to share their perspective. The findings can contribute to further develop person-centered care in acute settings. 

Background: Globally, studies illustrate different approaches among health care professionals to decision making about caesarean section (CS) and that attitudes regarding the extent to which a CS on maternal request (CSMR) can be granted vary significantly, both between professionals and countries. Absence of proper regulatory frameworks is one potential explanation for high CSMR rates in some countries, but overall, it is unclear how recommendations and guidelines on CSMR relate to CSMR rates. In Sweden, CSMR rates are low by international comparison, but statistics show that the extent to which maternity clinics perform CSMR vary among Sweden’s 21 self-governing regions. These regions are responsible for funding and delivery of healthcare, while national guidelines provide guidance for the professions throughout the country; however, they are not mandatory. To further understand considerations for CSMR requests and existing practice variations, the aim was to analyse guideline documents on CSMR at all local maternity clinics in Sweden. Methods: All 43 maternity clinics in Sweden were contacted and asked for any guideline documents regarding CSMR. All clinics replied, enabling a total investigation. We used a combined deductive and inductive design, using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. Results: Overall, 32 maternity clinics reported guideline documents and 11 denied having any. Among those reporting no guideline documents, one referred to using national guideline document. Based on the Framework method, four theme categories were identified: CSMR is treated as a matter of fear of birth (FOB); How important factors are weighted in the decision-making is unclear; Birth contracts are offered in some regions; and The post-partum care is related to FOB rather than CSMR. Conclusion: In order to offer women who request CS equal and just care, there is a pressing need to either implement current national guideline document at all maternity clinics or rewrite the guideline documents to enable clinics to adopt a structured approach. The emphasis must be placed on exploring the reasons behind the request and providing unbiased information and support. Our results contribute to the ongoing discussion about CSMR and lay a foundation for further research in which professionals, as well as stakeholders and both women planning pregnancy and pregnant women, can give their views on this issue. 

Background: In this study, the focus is on how to support the competence development needed for nursing assistants in home care. Home care services for older persons can be challenging concerning the nature of the interpersonal interaction and communication needed to care for and respond to the diverse needs of older people who seek to live well in our communities. This implies a need to offer more person-centred care (PCC) to older persons. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how to develop such competence. We, therefore, developed A Person-centred CommunicaTION (ACTION) programme, which is a web-based educational intervention aimed at supporting competence development for nursing assistants. The research objective is to evaluate the ACTION programme with respect to participants’ responses to and the effect of the intervention. Methods: A multicentre case–control study with pre- and post-assessments was designed. The ACTION programme will be implemented at home care units, in two different geographic areas in Sweden. A total of 300 nursing assistants will be recruited: 150 for the intervention group and 150 for the control group. We will evaluate the impact measures and the process. Pre- and post-assessments will be performed with data collected via a) audio recordings of communication, b) a questionnaire on self-efficacy communication skills, PCC, empathy and job satisfaction, c) user data, evaluation forms, field notes and observations, and d) interviews. The data will be analysed with descriptive and analytic statistics and/or qualitative methods for meanings. Discussion: This study has the potential to contribute to the evidence supporting competence development required to offer person-centred and quality home care to older persons and to meet upcoming needs for flexible and easily accessible competence development. Trial registration: ISRCTN64890826. Registered 10 January 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN64890826